In the late third trimester, the fetal skeleton enters a period of
rapid growth that requires calcium, phosphorus and vitamin D. An infant
born six weeks prematurely has laid down only half the calcium into its
bones as an infant carried to term.28 There is evidence that vitamin D
plays a role in lung development,29 and it probably plays a
much larger role in fetal development in general due to vitamin D’s
interaction with vitamin A. At birth, the infant’s blood level of
vitamin D is closely correlated to that of the mother.30,31 Adequate levels of vitamin D protect the newborn from tetany, convulsions and heart failure.29
The rapid skeletal growth that occurs in late pregnancy taxes the
vitamin D supply of the mother and her blood levels drop over the course
of the third trimester. One study conducted in Britain showed that 36
percent of new mothers and 32 percent of newborn infants had no
detectable vitamin D in their blood at all; another showed that 60
percent of infants born to white mothers in the spring and summer had levels under 8 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL), a level that is overtly deficient.32
In 1963, the American Academy of Pediatrics acknowledged the
increased need for vitamin D during the third trimester of pregnancy.
The Academy lamented the lack of data elucidating the precise amount of
this need and suggested that 400 IU per day would cover the requirements
of mother and fetus.28
In 1997, however, the Institute of Medicine declared that the
transfer of vitamin D from the mother to the fetus is so small that the
mother’s vitamin D status is not affected. Citing a 1978 study showing
that the average vitamin D level of pregnant women consuming small
amounts of vitamin D at high latitudes was 9.1 ng/mL (25 percent under
the level required to protect against overt deficiency) the Institute
concluded that “there is no additional need to increase the vitamin D
age-related [adequate intake] during pregnancy above that required for
non-pregnant women.” This conclusion is strange, not only because many
of the mothers in this study must have had vitamin D levels below the
average, but because the average level itself was already deficient. The
Institute set the recommended intake at 200 IU, which it rather
dubiously supposed “may actually represent an overestimate of true
biological need.”33
In 2003, the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Committee on Nutrition
and its Section on Breastfeeding issued a joint statement in which they
overturned the 40-year position of the Academy advocating 400 IU in
favor of adopting the lower so-called “overestimate” of the Institute of
Medicine.34
In the second part of this statement, the Academy directed mothers to
keep their infants out of the sun, dress them in protective clothing,
and liberally cover them in sunblock. In the last part of the statement,
it emphasized that breast milk is deficient in vitamin D—making no
mention of the fact that the low intake of vitamin D during pregnancy
and lactation that it advocates and the practice of keeping infants out
of the sun are the precise factors responsible for low vitamin D levels
in breast milk and infant vitamin D deficiency.
The Weston A. Price Foundation recommends 2,000 IU per day of vitamin
D from cod liver oil, and small additional amounts from fatty fish,
shellfish, butter, and lard. Although no studies have directly assessed
the use of this dose during pregnancy, a study of over 10,000 infants in
Finland conducted between 1966 and 1997 showed that direct
supplementation of 2,000 IU per day to infants in the first year of life
virtually eradicated the risk of type 1 diabetes over the next 30
years.35
No comments:
Post a Comment